Kameme FM Presenters Deny Incitement Allegations and Report Security Threats

Photo collage/Journalist Gatonye Mbugua & muthoni wakirumba in an music event 

Kameme FM media personalities Muthoni wa Kirumba and Gatonywa Mbugua have found themselves at the center of a heated public debate after an online campaign accused them of fueling national unrest and inciting members of the public, especially in the Mount Kenya region. The two popular radio presenters, who host one of the station's widely followed breakfast shows, have recently faced growing criticism on social media. Some online users claim that their discussions and political interviews are creating division, while their supporters argue that the presenters are only performing their role as journalists by discussing matters of public interest. The controversy has attracted significant attention across the country, raising fresh questions about media freedom, responsible journalism, and the increasing influence of social media in shaping public opinion.

Speaking during a recent breakfast show, Gatonye Mbugua strongly defended both himself and his co-host, Muthoni wa Kirumba. He dismissed the accusations being circulated online, saying they were part of a coordinated campaign aimed at damaging their reputation. According to Mbugua, some individuals have deliberately created a narrative portraying the two broadcasters as people who encourage violence and division. He argued that the claims are false and are intended to mislead the public about the nature of their work. Mbugua maintained that their responsibility as journalists is to discuss important national issues, give people a platform to express their views, and hold leaders accountable whenever necessary.

The veteran broadcaster also opened up about the personal impact the online campaign has had on his life. Mbugua revealed that he has received several threatening phone calls from unknown individuals following some of the discussions aired on the breakfast show. He said the calls have raised concerns about his personal safety and that of his family. Besides the threatening calls, he claimed that he has noticed suspicious vehicles following him on different occasions. Although he did not provide evidence linking the incidents to the online campaign, he said the experiences have caused fear and anxiety. According to Mbugua, no journalist should have to live under intimidation simply because they are carrying out their professional duties.

Video below:

The allegations against the Kameme FM presenters became more pronounced after they aired discussions touching on government performance, corruption, and governance. The presenters have also hosted several political figures on their program, including former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, whose political activities continue to generate national debate. Critics argue that providing such leaders with a platform may contribute to political polarization. However, Mbugua insists that interviewing politicians from different sides of the political divide is part of normal journalism. He said media houses should not be criticized for giving leaders an opportunity to explain their positions or respond to issues affecting the country.

Mbugua further explained that many of the topics discussed on their show are based on real-life experiences affecting ordinary Kenyans. He cited the example of a friend who was allegedly detained at Kenyatta National Hospital because of challenges linked to the Social Health Authority (SHA) system. According to him, sharing such stories is not meant to attack specific individuals or institutions but to highlight the struggles many citizens face while seeking healthcare services. He argued that discussing these challenges helps create awareness and encourages authorities to address problems affecting the public. Mbugua emphasized that raising concerns about public services should not be interpreted as incitement or an attempt to create conflict.

During his remarks, Mbugua used a well-known proverb to explain how he views the accusations against him and his colleague. He compared the situation to the saying, "Give a dog a bad name before hanging it." In his view, the accusations of incitement are part of a deliberate strategy to damage their credibility before any further action is taken against them. He suggested that branding journalists as troublemakers without evidence can weaken public trust in the media and make it easier for critics to dismiss legitimate reporting. He warned that such tactics could discourage journalists from covering sensitive topics that are important to the public.

The broadcaster also expressed concern over what he described as a double standard in Kenya's political discussions. According to Mbugua, some people are quickly labeled as regional inciters simply because they refuse to criticize former President Uhuru Kenyatta or because they are perceived to have friendly relations with Rigathi Gachagua. He argued that political opinions should not automatically be interpreted as attempts to divide communities. Instead, he called for fairness and consistency when evaluating public commentary and media discussions. Mbugua maintained that journalists should be judged by the accuracy and professionalism of their reporting rather than by assumptions about their political preferences.

The controversy surrounding the two presenters has generated mixed reactions among Kenyans. Some social media users believe journalists should exercise extra caution when discussing politically sensitive matters, especially at a time when the country continues to experience political tensions. Others have defended Muthoni wa Kirumba and Gatonywa Mbugua, saying they are simply providing a platform for public debate and giving voice to concerns raised by ordinary citizens. Supporters argue that democracy depends on a free media that can ask difficult questions and hold leaders accountable without fear of intimidation or retaliation.

Media experts have often noted that journalists play a vital role in informing the public and encouraging accountability. However, they also stress the importance of responsible reporting, balanced discussions, and verification of facts. At the same time, journalists should be able to perform their duties without threats, harassment, or intimidation. Allegations of incitement are serious and should be supported by credible evidence rather than speculation or online campaigns. Similarly, members of the media are expected to maintain professional standards and avoid language that could encourage hatred or violence.

As the debate continues, the situation involving Muthoni wa Kirumba and Gatonywa Mbugua highlights the growing influence of social media in shaping public narratives. Online platforms have become powerful tools for sharing information, but they can also spread misinformation, create public pressure, and damage reputations within a short period. The case also raises broader questions about the relationship between politics, the media, and freedom of expression in Kenya. Whether the accusations against the Kameme FM presenters are justified or not, the discussion serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between protecting freedom of speech, ensuring responsible journalism, and safeguarding national unity. Many Kenyans will continue watching closely to see how the matter develops and whether further evidence or official responses emerge in the coming days.