Photo collage/Journalist Gatonye Mbugua & muthoni wakirumba in an music event

Video below:

The allegations against the Kameme FM presenters became more pronounced after they aired discussions touching on government performance, corruption, and governance. The presenters have also hosted several political figures on their program, including former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, whose political activities continue to generate national debate. Critics argue that providing such leaders with a platform may contribute to political polarization. However, Mbugua insists that interviewing politicians from different sides of the political divide is part of normal journalism. He said media houses should not be criticized for giving leaders an opportunity to explain their positions or respond to issues affecting the country.

Mbugua further explained that many of the topics discussed on their show are based on real-life experiences affecting ordinary Kenyans. He cited the example of a friend who was allegedly detained at Kenyatta National Hospital because of challenges linked to the Social Health Authority (SHA) system. According to him, sharing such stories is not meant to attack specific individuals or institutions but to highlight the struggles many citizens face while seeking healthcare services. He argued that discussing these challenges helps create awareness and encourages authorities to address problems affecting the public. Mbugua emphasized that raising concerns about public services should not be interpreted as incitement or an attempt to create conflict.

During his remarks, Mbugua used a well-known proverb to explain how he views the accusations against him and his colleague. He compared the situation to the saying, "Give a dog a bad name before hanging it." In his view, the accusations of incitement are part of a deliberate strategy to damage their credibility before any further action is taken against them. He suggested that branding journalists as troublemakers without evidence can weaken public trust in the media and make it easier for critics to dismiss legitimate reporting. He warned that such tactics could discourage journalists from covering sensitive topics that are important to the public.

The broadcaster also expressed concern over what he described as a double standard in Kenya's political discussions. According to Mbugua, some people are quickly labeled as regional inciters simply because they refuse to criticize former President Uhuru Kenyatta or because they are perceived to have friendly relations with Rigathi Gachagua. He argued that political opinions should not automatically be interpreted as attempts to divide communities. Instead, he called for fairness and consistency when evaluating public commentary and media discussions. Mbugua maintained that journalists should be judged by the accuracy and professionalism of their reporting rather than by assumptions about their political preferences.

The controversy surrounding the two presenters has generated mixed reactions among Kenyans. Some social media users believe journalists should exercise extra caution when discussing politically sensitive matters, especially at a time when the country continues to experience political tensions. Others have defended Muthoni wa Kirumba and Gatonywa Mbugua, saying they are simply providing a platform for public debate and giving voice to concerns raised by ordinary citizens. Supporters argue that democracy depends on a free media that can ask difficult questions and hold leaders accountable without fear of intimidation or retaliation.

Media experts have often noted that journalists play a vital role in informing the public and encouraging accountability. However, they also stress the importance of responsible reporting, balanced discussions, and verification of facts. At the same time, journalists should be able to perform their duties without threats, harassment, or intimidation. Allegations of incitement are serious and should be supported by credible evidence rather than speculation or online campaigns. Similarly, members of the media are expected to maintain professional standards and avoid language that could encourage hatred or violence.

As the debate continues, the situation involving Muthoni wa Kirumba and Gatonywa Mbugua highlights the growing influence of social media in shaping public narratives. Online platforms have become powerful tools for sharing information, but they can also spread misinformation, create public pressure, and damage reputations within a short period. The case also raises broader questions about the relationship between politics, the media, and freedom of expression in Kenya. Whether the accusations against the Kameme FM presenters are justified or not, the discussion serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between protecting freedom of speech, ensuring responsible journalism, and safeguarding national unity. Many Kenyans will continue watching closely to see how the matter develops and whether further evidence or official responses emerge in the coming days.